THE
DISCOVERY OF THE ZERO

The zero is the
mathematically defined numerical function of nothingness that
is used not for an evasion but for an apprehension of reality.
The "nothing" has been the exclusive territory of
mystics and neocheaters. They thrive on "nothing",
in nonreality, and create their mystical edifice of power and
dominance upon "nothing" with "nothing".
The zero is the only
"nothing" thus far conceived that is nonmystical,
i.e., reality-based. It is a tool, a mathematical tool, for
dealing with reality, and as such is integral to the whole
context of reality qua
reality. After the Renaissance, the monopolization of
knowledge became broken and scientific knowledge flourished
owing largely to the propagation of this mathematical
"nothing", the zero -- to the increased
computational capability among common people that was made
possible solely by the widespread use of the zero concept and
its counterpart -- the place-value numerical system.
On the assumption that an
Aristotelian-based philosophy rather than a Platonistic
philosophy had dominated the Western world since the Golden
Age of Greece, Neo-Tech predicts
the following retrospectively
(see "Neo-Tech Discovery", Neo-Tech Advantage #77,
An Aristotelian Course of History):
| 350 B.C. |
Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)
|
| 200 B.C. |
America discovered.
|
| 100 B.C. |
Free-enterprise capitalism established
around the world.
|
| 0 B.C. |
All traces of mysticism, altruism, are
gone.
|
| 20 A.D. |
Electrical power developed, camera
developed.
|
| 40 A.D. |
Internal-combustion engine developed.
|
| 50 A.D. |
Cars in mass production. Airplane
developed.
|
| 60 A.D. |
Computer developed...
|
| 70 A.D. |
Nuclear power developed.
|
| 80 A.D. |
Man on the Moon.
|
| 100 A.D. |
Man on Mars and heading for other
planets.
|
| 120 A.D. |
Human biological immortality developed.
200 A.D.Universal immortality achieved...
|
As revealed in
the second chapter, exactly as predicted above, the
Phoenician navigators circumnavigated the world and
discovered the American continent around 200 B.C., preceding
Columbus and Magellan by 1700 years. Aristarchus'
heliocentric theory of the universe was developed
approximately fifty years prior to that circumnavigation.
However, also around 200 B.C., with the rise of the Romans,
Platonistic-based philosophies became increasingly more
dominant and growth in science rapidly declined, except in
Alexandria where Greek culture and science still continued to
flourish.
What is implicit in this
"retrospective forecast" of human history, however,
is that a numerical system much like ours with the zero and
the place-value principle should have been developed
somewhere between 200 and 100 B.C., for the Greek numerical
system was much too rudimentary to make the subsequent
developments in science and technology probable. In fact, no
matter what kind of numerical symbols people of antiquity
might have adopted, logic dictates that their number system
should have been the same as ours with the zero concept and
the place-value principle. Since man has ten fingers, it is
most likely that the base of their number system would have
been ten (10). The computers of 60 A.D. should have employed
a binary system due to the nature of logic.
Our modern written
numeration, with the zero concept and the place-value
principle, is such an ingenious, efficacious, and
conceptually integrated system that no one who has ever
considered the history of numerical notation or mathematics
fails to realize its enormous profundity, significance, and
power. For instance, consider the following addition -- the
same addition by means of Roman numerals and of our
Hindu-Arabic numerals:
| CCLXVIII |
268 |
| MDCCCVII |
1807 |
| DCL |
650 |
| MLXXX |
1080 |
| MMMDCCCV |
3805 |
Without
converting the Roman numerals into our modern system the
problem is difficult, if not impossible, to solve. And this
is only an addition -- multiplication or division would be
far worse. Roman numerals and most other systems do not lend
themselves to written computation owing largely to the static
nature of their basic numerals, which are in essence only
abbreviations for recording the results of computations done
by means of an abacus or counting board.
For this reason, before the
advent of our modern positional numeration (the zero and the
place-value system), the art of reckoning remained an
exclusive and highly skilled profession. Indeed, it attests
to the success wherewith the master neocheaters executed
their destructive substrategy, specialization of knowledge,
that the knowledge of reckoning remained so exclusive a
profession. That master neocheating strategy created a lack
of motivation for the advancement of knowledge, particularly
of science, and its accompanying mathematical/computational
tools.
Thus, no progress was made in
the field of reckoning in the Western world beyond Greek or
Roman numeration. Roman numeration, particularly, was an
intentional device to keep the populace ignorant and
powerless, forever confined in the perceptivity-centered
modality, in a mystical cave, by a mega-dose of neocheating.
Therefore, the discovery of
the zero and the development of the place-value numeration
had to wait for a less oppressive intellectual climate -- a
flourishing business and commercial atmosphere. Such a
climate took place in India between the first and fifth
centuries A.D. It was during that time in India that the zero
was discovered and the system of place-value numeration was
developed, almost reaching to their fullest formulation by
500 A.D.
Although in recorded history
the place-value number systems have been developed four times
(by the Babylonians, Mayans, Chinese, and Hindus), and the
zero concept has been evolved three times (by the
Babylonians, Mayans, and Hindus), none outside of the Hindus
have devised such a complete system of numerical operation.
Furthermore, none outside of the Hindus evolved the zero
concept to the degree that it is used as the null-value in
all facets of calculation.

Increased
commercial/business
activities during the first three centuries A.D. in India
called for further developments in navigational technology
and astronomical science, and for an evolution of a written
computational methodology for recording the process of
calculations that were employed in navigation, astronomy, and
business. To accomplish these ends, development of a superior
numerical system that lent itself to written computation
became imperative. It was the sea-dwelling individuals (who
acted as navigator, engineer, scientist, and businessmen) who
kept and evolved the lineage of advanced knowledge from
antiquity, that the place-value number system with the zero
concept was first developed.
The Chinese and South Asian
scholars, the Egyptians and Pythagoreans of the East, and the
Mayans of the West, further evolved and perfected the system
nearly to its present formulation. By using only ten
numerical symbols while assigning one of the ten symbols, the
zero, unique meanings and functions, they succeeded in
expressing infinitely large numbers and making complex
numerical operations remarkably more simple.
In Sanskrit (the scholarly language
of the Hindus), the word for the zero is "sunya",
meaning "void", and there is little doubt that the
zero concept originated as the written symbol for the empty
column of the abacus. The abacus had been used around the
world since antiquity to provide a facile means of
accumulating progressive products of multiplication by moving
those products ever further leftward, column by column, as
the operator filled the available bead spaces one by one and
moved the excess over ten into the successive
right-to-left-ward columns.
Number products in even tens
(such as the number 20 or 30) leave the first right hand
column empty (void). When expert abacus users had no abacus
available to them, they could remember and visualize the
operation of the abacus so clearly that all they needed to
know was the content of each column in order to develop any
multiplication or division.
They then invented symbols
for the content of each column to replace drawing a picture
of the number of beads. Having developed symbols to express
the content of each column, they had to invent a symbol for
the numberless content of the empty column -- that symbol
came to be known to the Hindus as "sunya",
and sunya later
became "sifr"
in Arabic; "cifra"
in Roman; and finally "cipher"
in English.
Only an empty column of an
abacus could possibly provide the human experience that
called for the invention of the zero -- the symbol for
"nothingness", and that discovery of the symbol for
nothingness had an enormous significance upon subsequent
humanity. The zero, the cipher, alone made possible
humanity's escape from the 1700-year monopoly of all its
calculating functions by the neocheating power structure
operating invisibly behind their governments and religions.
It was also the power of
nothingness, the zero, that raised the curtains of science
during the Renaissance, which had been drawn by the master
neocheaters since 200 B.C. (It is significant to realize that
the positional numeration with the zero concept had been
implicitly employed in the operation of the abacus almost in
its entirety, including the zero being the null-value. The
Hindu numeration was the written
translation of that operation.)
Even if the zero with the
place-value principle and its computation-facilitating
capability had been discovered by the Alexandrian Greeks, by
Archimedes or Apollonius, for instance, it would have been
banished or even lost when the emperors of the Roman Empire
amalgamated the vast power of the priesthood with their
already-established military supremacy.
Historically, Roman numerals
had been invented to enable completely illiterate people to
keep "scores" of events occurring one by one. The
more complex Roman numerals were those used by their
superiors, keeping count by their fingers -- V for five (the
angle between one's thumb and the other four fingers) and X
for ten (representing one's crossed index fingers). Since one
cannot see "no sheep" or "no person", the
Roman world had no need for a symbol for nothing.
For science to evolve, there
should be three basic socio-intellectual factors present:
- A flourishing business
climate that will provide an incentive to advance
knowledge
- An explicitly defined
Aristotelian philosophy that will provide the
metaphysical/epistemological foundation or context
for valid scientific knowledge and the ethical/moral
basis for productive living
- Mathematical tools, such
as the zero with the place-value principle, that will
facilitate the advancement of science.
During the Renaissance all
three of these factors were clearly present. Science did not
develop in India after the discovery of the zero owing to the
fact that no explicitly defined Aristotelian philosophy had
ever been prevalent in India or had been known to the Hindus
in general.

Indian philosophies from Hinduism to
Buddhism, although they differed in various issues, all held
that reality could not be known by reason and logic but only
by a mystical union with existence called samadhi
or nirvana,
purported to be transcendental to reason and logic. They
believed that reason and logic could take them only to the
point where they could merge into existence through the
cessation of the mind. In truth, their mystical union, samadhi
or nirvana, was
nothing more than a glorified perception or sensation. They
inverted the epistemological order of human cognition, which
proceeds from sensation to perception and perception to
conception, and gave perception and sensation the ultimate
cognitive status.
Therefore, albeit the Hindus
perfected one of the greatest discoveries in human history --
the zero, they could not realize its cosmic function as a
mathematical tool of science. Although it required a
conceptuality-centered modality of consciousness to conceive
of the zero, the Hindus did not possess a
conceptuality-centered philosophy -- an Aristotelian
philosophy -- to integrate the zero concept into a larger
philosophical scheme so as to bring about its fruits. The
zero, thus, had to wait for nearly 1000 years until the time
of Leonardo da Vinci and Copernicus in order to bear its
fruits and transform the human world forever.

Meanwhile, in the West, the Romans repeatedly
burned the Alexandrian library, which as early as 100 B.C.
was reputed to have had 700,000 manuscripts containing the
wealth of Greek intellectual achievements. The library was
first set on fire in 47 B.C. during the war between Caesar
and Pompey (40,000 volumes were burned), set ablaze in 272
A.D. by a Roman emperor, ignited in 391 A.D. by another Roman
emperor, and finally completely destroyed by the Muslims in
642 A.D. Thus, before the zero could reach the Western world
around 700 A.D. via the Moorish invasion of Spain, the
intellectual soil wherein this remarkable concept could have
borne fruit had been destroyed almost completely by the
master neocheaters and their neocheating strategies. The
Western world had entered the Dark Ages.